Two recent cases have resulted in important decisions by courts, which have ramifications on the way cedants allocate claim payments to their reinsurers post settlement. Robert W. Diubaldo explores the implications of the cases.
It is not uncommon for ceding companies and their reinsurers to become embroiled in disputes concerning the manner in which a claim or settlement payment is allocated to the reinsured policies or applicable reinsurance contracts.
This article discusses two recent noteworthy decisions that illustrate both the deference accorded to, and the limitations placed on, ceding companies’ allocations of claim payments to their reinsurers.
The first case, Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America, involved a settlement between Travelers and its insured to resolve, among other things, breast implant and chemical products claims. Travelers Casualty (Travelers) allocated the settlement amount ($137 million) among three tiers of insurance that provided coverage for those claims.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to Intelligent Insurer. Start a subscription today for £655.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the Intelligent Insurer website – register and select “Two Week Free Trial” to begin access to the full Intelligent Insurer archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £655 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please contact support.
Reinsurance, Claims, Legal, Ace America Reinsurance Company, Travelers