Hurst Photo / Shutterstock.com
Henning Ludolphs, managing director of retrocessions and capital markets at Hannover Re, examines the pros and cons of, and offers some observations about, cat bonds and collateralised reinsurance.
The insurance-linked securities (ILS) market reached a volume of approximately $60 billion at the end of 2014, an increase of more than 20 percent, or $10 billion, on a year ago. This is remarkable growth.
At the same time the amount of new catastrophe bond issuance has increased from about $7.7 billion to $8.7 billion. This is still a significant increase in percentage terms, but in US dollar terms it is ‘only’ one billion, so where is the rest?
A few years ago the transfer of re/insurance risks to capital markets by way of collateralised reinsurance started. Nowadays collateralised reinsurance represents about $30 billion, or half of the ILS market. This compares to around $24 billion of catastrophe bond volume overall, of which $8.7 billion is new issuance with the balance being outstanding from issuance in previous years. Why has collateralised reinsurance grown so much?
To continue reading, you need a subscription to Intelligent Insurer. Start a subscription today for £655.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the Intelligent Insurer website – register and select “Two Week Free Trial” to begin access to the full Intelligent Insurer archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £655 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please contact support.
Hannover Re, ILS, cat bonds