This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Continue if you are OK with this or read more in our privacy policy. 

Cat bonds vs collateralised re


Cat bonds vs collateralised re

Hurst Photo / Shutterstock.com

Henning Ludolphs, managing director of retrocessions and capital markets at Hannover Re, examines the pros and cons of, and offers some observations about, cat bonds and collateralised reinsurance.

The insurance-linked securities (ILS) market reached a volume of approximately $60 billion at the end of 2014, an increase of more than 20 percent, or $10 billion, on a year ago. This is remarkable growth.

At the same time the amount of new catastrophe bond issuance has increased from about $7.7 billion to $8.7 billion. This is still a significant increase in percentage terms, but in US dollar terms it is ‘only’ one billion, so where is the rest?

A few years ago the transfer of re/insurance risks to capital markets by way of collateralised reinsurance started. Nowadays collateralised reinsurance represents about $30 billion, or half of the ILS market. This compares to around $24 billion of catastrophe bond volume overall, of which $8.7 billion is new issuance with the balance being outstanding from issuance in previous years. Why has collateralised reinsurance grown so much?

Hannover Re, ILS, cat bonds

Intelligent Insurer

Payment types accepted