The recent downgrades of numerous cat bonds triggered by changes to the risk models underpinning them may be a contributory factor in a sharp reduction in the number of non-specialised investors contributing to this sector.
Pete Vloedman of Anchor Risk Advisors analyses this dynamic.
Recent newswire headlines have brought the rationale for obtaining credit ratings on catastrophe (cat) bonds back into the structuring discussion. According to Swiss Re, approximately 94 percent of cat bonds in circulation have a credit rating. But what purpose do they serve? Are they worth the cost? Are credit ratings necessary to achieve full distribution of a cat bond? This article discusses the historical and current rationale for cat bond credit ratings.
Why do cat bonds have credit ratings?
To continue reading, you need a subscription to Intelligent Insurer. Start a subscription today for £655.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the Intelligent Insurer website – register and select “Two Week Free Trial” to begin access to the full Intelligent Insurer archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £655 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please contact support.
Catastrophe bonds, Cat bonds, Rating agencies, Alternative risk transfer