Tom Johansmeyer, assistant vice president, reinsurance services, marketing at ISO/Verisk Insurance Solutions, debunks the five top myths of exchange-traded risk, an idea whose time has come once again.
After 25 years of false starts and valiant efforts that fell victim to unfortunate timing, we’re ready again. The global insurance and reinsurance market is clamouring for another attempt at launching an exchange-traded risk solution.
Our most recent previous attempt was only two years ago, but much has changed since then. Specifically, the ‘cat bond lite’ market has shown that insurance-linked securities (ILS) funds and reinsurers can act as sources of original risk (http://my.verisk.com/originalriskresources?source=iiarticle) in capital markets catastrophe risk transfer transactions—providing a better starting point than the industry has ever had.
Not surprisingly, scepticism abounds. After all, every new attempt at developing an exchange-traded risk platform probably seemed like a great idea at the time. To show that it’s different this time, we need to tackle head-on five important myths about the future of exchange-traded catastrophe options. Let’s get started!
To continue reading, you need a subscription to Intelligent Insurer. Start a subscription today for £655.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the Intelligent Insurer website – register and select “Two Week Free Trial” to begin access to the full Intelligent Insurer archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £655 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please contact support.
Exchange-traded risk, reinsurance, ISO/Verisk Insurance Solutions, catastrophe, bond