23 January 2017Insurance

CreditSights analysts weigh up AIG’s $9.8bn reinsurance deal with Berkshire Hathaway

American International Group’s  (AIG) $9.8 billion reinsurance deal with Berkshire Hathaway covering US commercial long-tail exposures for accident years 2015 and prior comes at a “significant” cost for AIG but should offer improved earnings stability, according to analysts at CreditSights.

The analysts view the deal as credit positive in that future reserve charges on older blocks of business will be mostly absorbed by the deal providing improved earnings stability and partial protection against particularly adverse reserve developments.

But they also noted that “this comes at a significant cost given that AIG will be paying $9.8+ billion for the deal (of which ~$7.2 billion is currently set to be reimbursed) and will likely book a first quarter loss associated with the deal.”

They added: “From AIG's perspective, this is essentially a one-time lump sum payment to put many of its past underwriting challenges behind it. AIG's equity and credit performance has been dogged by frequent reserve adjustments and unexpected negative development associated with commercial P&C insurance.

“Furthermore, given that the liability side of the balance sheet is largely behind closed doors and unavailable to investors, it was difficult for either equity or credit to get comfortable with the level of reserves.”

They noted that AIG's commercial combined ratio has frequently exceeded 100 percent, meaning that the business was posting underwriting losses that needed to be made up through investment income. And certain quarters, such as 4Q15 and 4Q12, a reserve review process led to excessively high combined ratios of 160.4 percent and 130.4 percent.

The also noted that while the reinsurance deal will also free up capital for AIG, they expect that the company will return this capital to shareholders as part of its capital return plan.

“Though the reinsurance deal, to a partial extent, cleans the slate and addresses AIG's mixed underwriting of the past, we will need to see improved and consistent underwriting performance on new business before we expect so see credit spreads tighten,” the analysts noted.

“To that end, we give credit to management for emphasizing the importance of improved underwriting performance and for very clearly making it a priority. The company is willingly exiting unprofitable lines of business, choosing not to renew certain customers with lone products and limited cross-selling opportunities, and has shown some progress towards improving the current year accident loss ratio.

“The pressure is on for AIG and management to deliver strong current and future underwriting performance, especially in light of the fact that AIG also announced that it expects a material prior year adverse reserve development in 4Q16.”

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Elliot Field at efield@newtonmedia.co.uk or Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Insurance
23 January 2017   If ultimate losses remain unchanged, Berkshire Hathaway will net a gain of around $2.6 billion plus the float in its $9.8 billion US casualty reinsurance agreement with American International Group (AIG), analysts at CreditSights writing in a January 20 note.
Insurance
26 January 2017   Berkshire Hathaway’s $9.8 billion retroactive reinsurance deal with American International Group’s (AIG), revealed last week, is big enough to potentially jeopardize an underwriting profit in Warren Buffett’s reinsurer’s P&C operations for the first time.
Insurance
27 January 2017   AM Best has placed the financial strength ratings (FSR) of American International Group (AIG) and its insurance subsidiaries under review with negative implications because of concerns over its reserves.