25 April 2017Alternative Risk Transfer

Cyber assets more valuable than plant, property and equipment assets: Report

Organisations believe that their cyber assets are more valuable than plant, property and equipment (PP&E) assets despite spending four times more budget on insurance protecting the latter risks, according to the latest Aon/Ponemon report.

Organisations valued cyber assets 14 percent more than PP&E assets, the 2017 Cyber Risk Transfer Comparison Global Report shows.

"This unique cyber study found a serious disconnect in risk management," said Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute. "What's interesting is that the majority of companies cover plant, property and equipment losses, insuring an average of 59 percent and self-insuring 28 percent. Cyber is almost the opposite, as companies are insuring an average of 15 percent and self-insuring 59 percent."

The impact of business disruption to cyber assets is 72 percent greater than to property, plant and equipment assets, the report claims.

Quantification of probable maximum loss from cyber assets is 27 percent higher than from PP&E. Nearly 65 percent of organisations expect their cyber risk exposure to increase in the next two years.

While the majority of surveyed respondents find that cyber insurance is inadequate to meet the needs of their organisation, too expensive and has too many exclusions, 46 percent of respondents reported a data breach in the last two years with the average financial impact costing $3.6 million. Based on data breaches and security exploits experienced by the surveyed organisations, the greatest threats are business process failures that caused disruption to business operations as well as cyber attacks that caused disruption to both business and IT operations.

Kevin Kalinich, cyber/network global practice leader, Aon Risk Solutions, said: "This study compared the relative insurance protection of certain tangible versus intangible assets. We have found that most organisations spend multiples more premium for fire insurance, for example, than for cyber insurance, even though they state in their publicly disclosed documents that a majority of the organisation's value is attributed to intangible assets."

Today’s top stories

Towergate jobs at risk as firm restructures

XL Catlin boosts global M&A team with new hires from Liberty and AIG

National Mortgage Insurance to buy $211.3m ILS reinsurance cover in Bermuda

Data breaches increase in Q1 2017: Beazley

Liberty hires senior exec from XL Catlin for European role

Everest Re Group achieves profitable growth in Q1 2017

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Elliot Field at efield@newtonmedia.co.uk or Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Insurance
24 April 2017   The cyber insurance market will become more resilient if it is considered as a standalone line of business rather than a peril, according to JLT Re.
Insurance
26 January 2017   The fear of an impending cyber attack driven by a series of high-profile breaches has led to a surge in the demand for cyber insurance, with many insurers now broadening the scope of the coverage offered. But this also brings challenges, as Intelligent Insurer finds.