17 July 2017Insurance

US insurance costs would soar if border adjustment tax is passed

Californians alone would face $1.9 billion in higher insurance costs if Congress passes a border adjustment tax as part of federal tax reform, according to a new study released today by the R Street Institute and the Pacific Research Institute (PRI).

This tax would make it virtually impossible for US insurers to buy global reinsurance, which they commonly use to spread risk and keep insurance rates affordable.

The PRI study concluded that despite the constant risk of natural disasters in the state, Californians have affordable property insurance rates because insurers can spread the risk by buying international reinsurance.

It also noted that under current tax law, US insurers can write off the costs of international reinsurance just like any other cost of doing business, helping them to keep policies affordable. They cede about 20 percent of direct written premiums to reinsurers annually.

The report noted that if insurers are not able to buy reinsurance to spread their risk, all the risk would be concentrated in the US rather than spread globally. This would make California's insurance market less competitive, and result in Californians paying higher premiums.

A border-adjustment tax is one of the ideas that has been floated in Washington as part of a major tax reform effort expected later this year. To date, specific legislative proposals have not yet been put forward by Congress or the White House.

"As Congress prepares to consider structural changes to the US tax code, proposals that target international reinsurance would have adverse consequences on the ability of Californians to obtain affordable coverage," said Lars Powell, Ian Adams, and RJ Lehmann, authors of the report.

Dr. Wayne Winegarden, PRI senior fellow in business and economics, added: "Whatever road Washington takes on tax reform, it must act carefully and avoid the unintended consequences of a proposal like a border-adjustment tax.

"Adopting tax reform that has the effect of increasing the insurance rates of all Californians, or worse, devastating our state's insurance market, is the wrong approach."

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.

Today’s stories

Big cyber attack could cost $53bn in economic losses, Lloyd’s warns

Nexus snaps up trade credit MGA Equinox Global

Arnott Marine hires Sullivan to boost cargo MGA

Patria Re hires Berkley Re duo into its Lloyd’s vehicle

TransRe appoints global head of business development

Lloyd’s underwriting head departs for Tokio Millennium Re

Guy Carpenter hires Arch exec to lead advisory capabilities in US

Sirius boosts environmental unit with Great American and Starr hires

Don't miss our monthly insurtech email newsletter - sign up today

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Elliot Field at efield@newtonmedia.co.uk or Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Insurance
17 July 2017   Trade bodies have welcomed the news that the US intends to sign a covered agreement with the European Union noting that it provides certainty for reinsurers on both sides of the Atlantic.
Insurance
6 November 2017   The proposed House bill calls for 20 percent corporate tax rate, which could lift earnings of US property/casualty (P&C companies) by around 14 percent on average, according to Morgan Stanley analysts.