21 March 2017Alternative Risk Transfer

Reinsurers lose out to non-traditional forms of risk transfer

Though insurers are ceding more of their premium than they were ten years ago, reinsurers have not necessarily benefited because more risk is being assumed by non-traditional risk bearing entities in various forms, according to research by Conning.

Already registered?

Login to your account

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Alternative Risk Transfer

Casualty ILS could benefit from softening cat bond market, says AM Best

12 March 2026 Investors eye alternatives as property cat rates soften, returns drop.

Alternative Risk Transfer

SCS cat bonds offer ‘compelling opportunity’ for regional US insurers

11 March 2026 Acrisure Re calls increasing storms ‘the defining catastrophe peril’ for the market.

Alternative Risk Transfer

Augment Risk turns up LatAm heat with new parametric, weather risk tools

19 February 2026 Miami team to craft weather risk solutions for energy, utilities and industry.

More articles

Ripple effect: wider economic impacts of Middle East conflict to affect global re/insurers

E&S property rates drop up to 20%, capacity surge fuels fierce competition

European insurance M&A activity at record levels in 2025

Gallagher Re lands NA fac leader with 20-year market track record

Moody’s concurs: Middle east conflict at last just weeks

Global firms more exposed to Middle East supply disruption than they think

Dual North America boosts surety limits with Axis partnership

Malicious cyber threats heightened by Middle East crisis: Aon

Copyright © intelligentinsurer.com 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze