regulatory-paradox-620

1 October 2012Insurance

A regulatory paradox

Reinsurers’ love-hate relationship with Solvency II goes on. After many years of debate over the detail of the bill the deadline is finally looming—in theory. In recent years, some companies have been proactive and embraced the new regime while others have procrastinated and complained about it.

Already registered?

Login to your account

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

LA wildfires one year on: system strain and a slow rebuild

7 January 2026 Still veiled behind the curtain: damage to the FAIR Plan, hope in subrogation.

City on fire: could LA wildfires happen in Australia?

7 January 2026 Climate body asks the question, points to rising climate, demographic similarities.

Florida court vacancies: tort reforms cut down litigation again in 2025

7 January 2026 Court filings are down 26% in 11M 2025 after 23% decline the year prior.

More articles

LA wildfires one year on: system strain and a slow rebuild

City on fire: could LA wildfires happen in Australia?

Phoenix Re rises, grows cat bond capacity to $115m

Florida court vacancies: tort reforms cut down litigation again in 2025

QBE Re crashes into casualty sidecar market

MS Re turns to experience to lead investment strategy

Arch promotes underwriter to look after London Market professional indemnity

Gallagher Re’s Bermuda desk boosted by Artex talent with head of strategic solutions

Copyright © intelligentinsurer.com 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze