9 July 2018News

Earnings volatility concerns drive reinsurance buying

Reinsurance is used increasingly for earnings protection and volatility reduction by insurers whose purchasing is guided by “risk appetite statements” deployed to optimize capital management and profitability targets, according to a survey of insurers by Willis Towers Watson.

Eighty percent of insurers consider their risk appetite statements when defining their reinsurance strategies, according to the Global Reinsurance and Risk Appetite Survey Report 2017/2018.

Due to pressure from investors, insurers are becoming less tolerant of missed earnings targets. As a result, they are moving to more sophisticated metrics, such as return on equity and economic capital, the broker said.

Of 260 insurers from 51 countries surveyed, 98 percent have adopted a formal risk appetite, or intend to within three years. Respondents’ enterprise risk management capabilities have improved, but more progress is needed to achieve companies’ risk-culture goals. Meanwhile, most respondents said that cyber is their main risk concern, due largely to difficulties in defining and managing cyber both from the underwriting and operational perspectives.

“Managing the volatility of underwriting results is of prime importance to insurers, and reinsurance strategy measured by risk appetite is key to that,” says James Kent, global CEO Willis Re. “This is particularly relevant for public companies where perceived volatility can severely impact share price, but also a wider range of insurers are now much more likely to consider a broad range of consolidated earnings metrics when assessing the impact of reinsurance. Our survey shows that the number of non-life insurers using rate of return on equity as their primary earnings metric has doubled in the past two years. This is in line with what we are currently experiencing in the field when realigning reinsurance programs to insurers’ strategies.”

Alice Underwood, global leader, insurance consulting and technology, added: “Changes to the global regulatory environment have increased the emphasis on capital measures and targets.

“Although regulatory capital is still the most relevant capital measure, economic and catastrophe risk capital are gaining momentum. The use of internal capital models increased substantially from a third to more than half of insurers between 2015 and 2017,” Underwood noted.

Make sure you are GDPR compliant and  confirm your email address to keep getting our daily emails

More of today's news

MGAA may enlarge membership to embrace insurtechs, says body’s chair Manchester

Travelers unveils standalone cyber insurance in UK, Ireland

More than 100 die in record floods in Japan

MS Amlin strengthens European war business with Aon hire

Horseshoe appoints new London head from MS Amlin for ILS boost

Don't miss our insurtech email newsletter - sign up today

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Elliot Field at efield@newtonmedia.co.uk or Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

News
14 May 2018   Having given up on reinsurance in recent decades, some large insurers have had a change of heart as they seek diversification and the access to the capital markets which reinsurers have developed in recent years. Is their bet that they can handle these volatile risks—and that their shareholders will back them—a risky one? Intelligent Insurer investigates.
Insurance
10 July 2018   New York-based Kingstone Companies, a multi-line regional property and casualty insurance holding company has increased its reinsurance coveraged for the treaty year beginning July 1, 2018.
Insurance
12 July 2018   Risk models are good at estimating the losses arising from ‘conventional hurricane events’ but their performance decreases when it comes to more severe or unusual events, according to a study by JLT Re, which analysed the precision of modelled market loss estimates for significant hurricanes since 2004.