angel-devil-620
1 March 2012InsuranceJim Bachman and Tobias Gummersbach

Solvency II: the dilemma

At the risk of making a generalisation, the Solvency II framework is very specific with respect to its ultimate evaluation criterion: 99.5 percent Value-at-Risk (VaR). Companies can derive their estimates of VaR using a standard model, as described in the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) Technical Specification papers, for example, or they can develop their own model. In a sense, these two options characterise the subtle difference between a ‘rules-based’ and ‘principles-based’ approach.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Insurance
4 June 2026   UK-based entity to target specialty and niche lines of business.
Insurance
4 June 2026   Business line targets collectors, galleries, jewellers and specie risks.
Insurance
4 June 2026   Texas insurer of last resort turns year-end deficit into Q1 surplus.