angel-devil-620
1 March 2012InsuranceJim Bachman and Tobias Gummersbach

Solvency II: the dilemma

At the risk of making a generalisation, the Solvency II framework is very specific with respect to its ultimate evaluation criterion: 99.5 percent Value-at-Risk (VaR). Companies can derive their estimates of VaR using a standard model, as described in the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) Technical Specification papers, for example, or they can develop their own model. In a sense, these two options characterise the subtle difference between a ‘rules-based’ and ‘principles-based’ approach.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Week Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Insurance
1 November 2026   Reinsurance Capacity is returning to US casualty, but social inflation, nuclear verdicts, uneven tort-reform landscape, and rate adequacy continue to shape disciplined deployment, while international markets are seeing broader competition.
Insurance
1 November 2026   The era of a ‘god-like’ broker sitting at the centre of everything – is over. At Holborn, the idea of “my client” has given way to “our client”, explains Adam Manus, president and incoming CEO of Holborn Corporation.
Insurance
1 November 2026   US insurers are increasing their use of facultative reinsurance to pursue growth while managing capital and volatility.