angel-devil-620
1 March 2012InsuranceJim Bachman and Tobias Gummersbach

Solvency II: the dilemma

At the risk of making a generalisation, the Solvency II framework is very specific with respect to its ultimate evaluation criterion: 99.5 percent Value-at-Risk (VaR). Companies can derive their estimates of VaR using a standard model, as described in the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) Technical Specification papers, for example, or they can develop their own model. In a sense, these two options characterise the subtle difference between a ‘rules-based’ and ‘principles-based’ approach.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Insurance
24 December 2025   From London to Bermuda, the market watched exits jolt the industry, teams reshuffle and others fall into place with far less fanfare.
Insurance
22 December 2025   Brokerage complaints spin tawdry tales to frame defections as low-rent theft & espionage.
Insurance
19 December 2025   Stable coverage keeps insureds with incumbents, ‘limiting new business opportunities’.